Dear Ms Coghlan,

I have received your letter dated September 20, 2001 which I take was your response to my letter of September 13, 2001.

I have no argument with your College’s right to publish a fair, accurate, non-biased summary of a Discipline Committee panel’s decision and reasons with respect to any of your members. I do not even argue your College’s right to ignore publishing pertinent facts that go to the credibility of your College and the witnesses such as:

Mrs. Terrick’s suicide attempts

Mrs. Terrick’s fake suicide attempt

Mrs. Terrick’s demand that I change my affidavit

The praise I received from the panel for refusing to release Mrs. Terrick’s extremely ill son from the hospital while the panel in essence condemned Ms Munro for following my order.

That the College’s expert witness was an employee of the College and that this fact was with- held by the College.

So long as your membership accepts the format by which you represent them you may do as you like with respect to your membership.

But, I am not a member of your College. And when the actions of your College wrongly cause me harm, I expect an immediate written apology from the College of Nurses and a full retraction as specified in my earlier letter of September 13, 2001. I did not ask for a bureaucratic letter of avoidance.

Please respond to my letter of September 13, 2001 forthwith.

Yours sincerely,